Freedom
Journal Entry: Sat Aug 11, 2007, 4:31 AM
- Mood:
Zest - Listening to: Drinking songs
- Reading: This and that
- Watching: Morse
- Playing: Europa Universalis III
- Eating: Fisherman's friend
- Drinking: Tea, beer, orange juice and akvavit
(Blame this journal on the unwavering army of liberalists ceaselessly praising "freedom")
What does it mean to be free? To that question there are two answers, one is a vague and/or incoherent mass of words such as "freedom", "choice" and more often than not "free market". The other, concrete, answer is "To be free is the opposite of being a slave." And thus the whole question is rendered a legal one, being free/unfree is in reality not a matter of having the freedom to choose, but of whether or not you are a slave or not.
Now I am aware of the fact that virtually all nations have outlawed slavery, and that this definition is thus obsolete, yet I stick with it, because it is the only possible way to describe freedom/unfreedom in absolute terms.
Take me as an example, I go to university and study history, that is well and good. Yet few weeks ago I had a conversation with my father, and he said that if I had not of my own accord opted for an academic education, he would have applied pressure on me. This begs the question, was my choice a free one? (Most liberalists would say so.) When I made it I did not know my father felt as strongly about it as I do now. Yet I would not have been free to unopposed make another choice.
Another example is the law, I am not absolutely free, as I am not free to break the law unpunished. While I do not dispute that laws are both good and practical, I merely observe that I cannot be absolutely free in a society that has them. Yet few people, myself included, would me unfree, I am merely relatively free. But for instance was the plantation slaves. They were free to stop working, of course they would be punished, but they were still free to chose to between rebellion, as numerous slave revolts clearly show, or accepting their slavery. Which is far from the degree of freedom I have, still a kind of freedom. Yet no one would call a slave free.
The way I see it, the only alternative to using free/slave as legal terms, is to dissolve both terms into a myriad of degrees of relative freedom.